In a bold and unapologetic stance, Minister Khumbudzo Ntshavheni has declared that she is unfazed by the possibility of the United States revoking her visa, insisting that no foreign power will deter her from speaking her mind or defending South Africa’s sovereignty.
Ntshavheni, known for her forthright political style, made the remarks during a public address on Saturday, where she criticised what she described as “heavy-handed diplomatic intimidation” aimed at discouraging South African leaders from taking independent positions on global issues. Her comment — “I don’t care if the US revokes my visa” — has since stirred intense political debate both domestically and internationally.
While she did not disclose any formal communication from Washington regarding her visa status, Ntshavheni suggested that global powers sometimes resort to administrative pressure when confronted by leaders who challenge their geopolitical narratives. “South Africa is not a satellite state of any nation,” she said. “We are a sovereign country with our own principles, and we will not be bullied into silence.”
Her remarks come amid increased scrutiny of South Africa’s diplomatic posture, particularly its positions on international conflicts and its calls for reforms within global institutions. Analysts say Ntshavheni’s comments reflect growing frustration within parts of the government who believe South Africa is being unfairly targeted for its independent foreign policy.
Political observers, however, remain divided. Some argue that the minister’s bold declaration reinforces South Africa’s commitment to non-alignment and global justice. Others caution that such statements risk straining already delicate diplomatic relationships, especially with major economic partners.
Within government circles, her comments have reportedly sparked conversations about the proper balance between diplomatic prudence and political candour. Several colleagues privately noted that while her message resonates with many South Africans, it could complicate ongoing bilateral engagements.
Opposition parties, meanwhile, seized on the statement to criticise what they called “reckless bravado,” warning that deteriorating relations with key global partners could have economic repercussions, particularly in trade, investment, and security cooperation.
Despite the controversy, Ntshavheni remains unwavering. She emphasised that her stance is not personal but principled, insisting that South Africa’s dignity on the global stage must not be compromised. “If speaking truth to power costs me a visa, so be it,” she said. “I serve the people of South Africa, not foreign governments.”
As debate swirls, one thing is clear: Ntshavheni’s defiance has injected new intensity into discussions about South Africa’s foreign policy identity — and the extent to which global powers influence it. Whether the comments will prompt diplomatic fallout remains to be seen, but the minister has made her position unmistakably clear.
