Mbalula Says ANC Don’t Need To Take Mogotsi To Court Like Zuma Because Zuma Was A Member

The political tension between the African National Congress (ANC) and its former associates intensified dramatically following a sharp denouncement delivered by Secretary-General Fikile Mbalula, who launched a scathing verbal offensive against one-time party affiliate, Brown Mogotsi. Speaking at a media briefing on Tuesday, Mbalula accused Mogotsi of attempting to maintain a tenuous connection to the movement solely through shallow, opportunistic personal associations, arguing that the individual fundamentally lacks a genuine, intellectual grasp of the organization’s rich history or its core revolutionary values.

Mbalula’s pointed remarks were a direct retort to Mogotsi’s recent public comments that had been critical of the ruling party’s current leadership. The Secretary-General was dismissive of the legitimacy of Mogotsi’s critiques, stating unequivocally that his association with the ANC was superficial at best, founded on circumstantial rather than ideological grounds. “Brown Mogotsi’s claim to fame is that he grew up in the same street in Mahikeng where the Secretary-General of the ANC was born, or that he once lived there,” Mbalula declared, cuttingly summarizing, “That is his narrow understanding of the party.” This was a clear attempt to dismantle Mogotsi’s perceived authority by reducing his supposed political weight to mere geographic proximity.

Visibly unamused by Mogotsi’s public statements, which had questioned the integrity of the current leaders and accused senior figures of steering the organization drastically away from its founding principles, Mbalula asserted that the ANC would not even deign to address the matter through formal legal or disciplinary channels. He drew a sharp and illuminating distinction between Mogotsi’s situation and that of a former head of state: “We don’t need to take him to court like Zuma because Jacob Zuma was a member.” This pointed comparison underscored Mbalula’s firm position that Mogotsi holds no formal, actionable standing within the party’s structures, effectively classifying him as an irrelevant outsider. The comment, which elicited laughter from some attendees, highlights Mbalula’s growing impatience with figures he believes are exploiting the ANC’s name solely for political grandstanding and self-promotion.

The Secretary-General used the platform to reiterate that while the ANC fully respects and remains open to genuine, constructive criticism originating from its bona fide members, it will not tolerate attempts to delegitimize the party from external sources or disgruntled former affiliates. He drew a crucial line between legitimate scrutiny and malicious intent: “There is a difference between critique and opportunism,” he stated firmly. This messaging serves as a warning shot, underscoring the party’s intent to police the boundaries of political debate, asserting that “Those who left or were expelled must stop pretending they still speak for the ANC.”

Political analysts suggest that Mbalula’s forceful intervention is a key part of the ANC’s preemptive strategy to vigorously protect its brand and image in the run-up to crucial upcoming municipal elections. The organization is facing constant internal pressure as numerous disillusioned figures and former cadres continue to resurface with damaging allegations of internal decay, deep-seated factionalism, and ideological drift. Mogotsi, despite his past claims of having deep ties to the North West ANC structures, is increasingly recognized in the political landscape for his political dissent rather than any real internal influence—a perception Mbalula was visibly determined to solidify and weaponize. By aggressively attacking the messenger, the party aims to neutralize the message, preventing criticisms from outsiders from gaining traction with the voting public.