Julius Malema has dismissed allegations made against him during the ongoing Madlanga Commission hearings, responding with humour after being accused of preventing General Khan from appearing before an Ad Hoc Committee. The Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) leader brushed aside the claims, suggesting that being blamed for controversy is nothing new to him.
The allegations were made by Vusi Shongwe, who told the commission that Malema was the main reason General Khan failed to appear before the committee. According to Shongwe, the EFF leader played a central role in the circumstances surrounding the missed appearance, adding a fresh layer of political tension to the already high-profile inquiry.
When asked to respond to the accusation, Julius Malema appeared unfazed. Instead of addressing the details of Shongwe’s testimony, he delivered a light-hearted response, comparing the situation to his school days.
“A boy will always be a boy. They used to report me to the principal that I was the one who caused a strike during my time in high school, nothing new,” Malema said, implying that he has long been accustomed to being blamed whenever disputes or controversies arise.
His remarks suggested that he views the latest allegations as part of a familiar pattern rather than a serious accusation requiring a detailed defence. The response quickly attracted attention, with supporters and critics alike weighing in on social media.
The exchange unfolded during the proceedings of the Madlanga Commission, which continues to hear testimony from political leaders, government officials and other witnesses as it investigates matters related to governance and accountability.
Shongwe’s claims have also highlighted growing political friction between the uMkhonto weSizwe Party (MK Party) and the Economic Freedom Fighters. Although both parties position themselves as alternatives to the governing ANC, recent developments have exposed increasing disagreements on key political issues.
For now, Malema has made it clear that he is not treating the allegations with concern, choosing instead to respond with humour. His comments are expected to keep public interest focused on both the commission’s proceedings and the political rivalry surrounding the case.
