Reports circulating on social media claim that Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) leader Julius Malema and his wife, Mantwa Matlala, may be heading for divorce, more than a decade after their widely publicised wedding in December 2014.
According to the unverified reports, the couple’s relationship has allegedly deteriorated, with claims of a separation now drawing significant public attention. The allegations, which have been widely shared online, also suggest long-term marital difficulties. However, these claims remain speculative and have not been confirmed by any official sources.
The rumours were amplified by controversial blogger Musa Khawula, whose posts quickly gained traction across digital platforms. Despite the growing online discussion, no court documents confirming divorce proceedings have been made publicly available, and neither Malema nor Matlala has issued a statement addressing the matter.
Julius Malema’s marriage is reportedly on the brink after claims that his wife, Mantwa Matlala, has filed for divorce.
Multiple reports allege the couple, who married in December 2014, are separating.
The divorce claims, widely circulated by controversial blogger Musa Khawula,… pic.twitter.com/FOwStCEAhY
— Limpopo Current Affairs (@LimpopoCurrent) February 26, 2026
As a prominent political figure, Malema’s private life often attracts heightened scrutiny, particularly on social media, where unverified information can spread rapidly. Analysts caution that, in the absence of formal confirmation, such claims should be treated carefully to avoid misinformation.
The couple married in a ceremony that drew national attention and have largely kept their family life out of the public eye in recent years. Their marriage has generally been regarded as private, with limited public commentary from either party.
Until an official announcement or legal confirmation emerges, the reported divorce remains unsubstantiated.
The speculation has sparked mixed reactions online, with some calling for respect for the family’s privacy, while others continue to debate the claims. Observers note that public figures are often subjected to intense personal scrutiny, raising broader questions about the balance between public interest and personal boundaries.
For now, the situation remains unclear, and any definitive conclusions will depend on formal statements or verified legal developments.
