A former high-ranking civil servant in KwaZulu-Natal has made serious accusations against the provincial chairperson of the African National Congress (ANC) and current MEC for Transport, Siboniso Duma. The official alleges that he faced severe repercussions, including being pushed out of his job, after refusing to authorize a substantial R10 million payment intended for ANC staff, purportedly as a “Christmas” bonus. This situation has sent ripples through the political landscape, sparking concerns about potential abuse of authority, political interference in government functions, and the inappropriate use of public money.
The former civil servant, who held a significant position within the provincial administration, claims he was pressured to approve the release of R10 million. This sum was reportedly presented as a festive season payout for individuals associated with the ANC. He asserts that the request was framed as a political imperative rather than a legitimate or budgeted government expense. Citing financial regulations and ethical principles, the official stated that he refused to authorize the payment.
Following his refusal, the former official contends that he experienced a pattern of mistreatment. He claims he was marginalized in his duties, subjected to disciplinary actions, and eventually forced out of his position. He believes these actions were a deliberate attempt to punish him for upholding rules and refusing to disburse the funds.
These allegations highlight a worrying overlap between party affairs and the administration of government. If these claims are substantiated, it could suggest an environment where political loyalty is prioritized over adherence to legal frameworks and sound governance practices. The former official maintains that public funds are not meant for political patronage and that civil servants should not be compelled to facilitate such actions.
Siboniso Duma has not yet provided a detailed public response to these accusations. However, the matter is likely to draw significant attention from various oversight bodies, opposition parties, and civil society groups. This case adds to existing worries about accountability within provincial governments and how officials are treated when they resist political pressure. The unfolding situation is expected to renew discussions about safeguarding whistleblowers and senior public servants who refuse to comply with questionable financial directives. Observers will be keenly watching to see if these allegations lead to a formal investigation and what outcomes may arise for those involved.
