A tense but humorous exchange unfolded during proceedings of the Madlanga Commission of Inquiry when advocate Nthabi Pooe asked controversial businessman Vusimuzi ‘Cat’ Matlala to go through a document overnight, prompting an unexpected response from the witness.
During the proceedings, Pooe instructed Matlala to carefully study the document so that he would be familiar with its contents when questioning continued.
However, Matlala appeared to have a practical concern about the request, explaining that his circumstances in prison would make it difficult for him to complete the task.
“Mr Matlala, please go through the document overnight,” Pooe told him.
Matlala responded by pointing out that he was currently being held in a prison cell, where access to lighting was limited.
“I’m in a prison cell, they switch off the lights,” he said.
His response caught the attention of Commission chairperson Justice Mbuyiseli Madlanga, who reacted with an expression of surprise and amusement.
“Oh nkosi yam,” Madlanga exclaimed, drawing attention to the unexpected nature of the exchange.
The brief interaction provided a lighter moment during what has otherwise been a series of serious and often tense hearings at the commission.
Matlala, who has become one of the prominent figures in the inquiry, has faced extensive questioning about his alleged connections with senior police officials, government figures and individuals linked to controversial procurement and security-related matters.
The commission is investigating allegations of criminality, corruption and political interference within South Africa’s criminal justice system. Its proceedings have attracted considerable public attention, particularly following testimony implicating influential individuals and raising questions about the relationship between law enforcement officials and politically connected businesspeople.
Matlala’s testimony has been closely watched as commissioners and legal representatives seek clarity on various allegations and relationships discussed during the inquiry.
The exchange with Pooe highlighted the unusual circumstances under which witnesses in custody participate in lengthy commission proceedings, with Matlala reminding the advocate that his prison environment presents practical challenges.
Although the exchange lasted only a short time, Madlanga’s reaction quickly became one of the lighter moments of the hearing.
The commission is expected to continue examining evidence and questioning witnesses as it works towards establishing the truth behind the allegations placed before it.
Matlala’s response also served as a reminder that even routine requests during the proceedings can produce unexpected moments.