A former senior civil servant has accused ANC chairperson Siboniso Duma of victimising him after he refused to authorise R10 million in so-called “Christmas” payouts to party staff. The allegations, which have surfaced in political circles, raise serious questions about internal party practices and the handling of public funds.
According to the complainant, who requested anonymity citing fear of retaliation, the payments were described as discretionary bonuses for ANC employees, but he contends that approving them would have been improper and potentially unlawful. His refusal, he claims, triggered punitive measures, including administrative pressure and professional marginalisation.
“This was not about generosity—it was about following the rules,” the former official said. “I was being pressured to release a sum of money that I believe was not justified. When I refused, I became the target of harassment.”
The incident highlights broader concerns over financial management and governance within political structures, particularly when public servants are expected to navigate directives that intersect with party interests. Observers note that such allegations can erode public confidence in both the party and the state institutions linked to it.
ANC chairperson Siboniso Duma has not publicly responded to the claims, and it remains unclear whether any formal investigation into the matter has been launched. Political analysts say the dispute reflects tensions between accountability and party loyalty, a recurring theme in South Africa’s political landscape.
Civil society groups emphasise the importance of transparency and adherence to ethical standards, warning that unverified payouts or the perception of coercion can have long-term consequences for governance and public trust.
As the story develops, scrutiny is likely to focus on the mechanisms for internal oversight within the ANC, the role of senior officials in authorising funds, and the protections available to civil servants who resist improper requests.