Khusela Diko, an ANC MP, has posed a pointed question about the Ad Hoc Committee’s procedure for summoning alleged underworld figure Vusimuzi “Cat” Matlala to testify before Parliament. Her inquiry is being conducted in the context of ongoing discussions regarding the necessity of summoning key witnesses as part of the investigation into KwaZulu-Natal Police Commissioner Lieutenant-General Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi’s explosive allegations of political interference and criminal infiltration in the South African Police Service (SAPS).
The committee’s increasing emphasis on firsthand testimony from individuals at the centre of the controversy is underscored by Diko’s intervention. She enquired about the manner in which Parliament intends to ensure Matlala’s appearance, considering the potential security risks and his current legal situation. Diko reportedly stated, “We must be explicit about the framework that governs such summonses,” emphasising the importance of adhering to parliamentary protocols and due process throughout the inquiry.
Following the disclosures made by former Police Minister Bheki Cele and current Minister Senzo Mchunu, who were both extensively questioned regarding their purported communications and interactions with Matlala, the demand for Matlala’s testimony has gained momentum. His name has been repeatedly associated with allegations of corruption, interference, and connections to high-ranking police officials.
Committee members are currently in the process of determining the most effective course of action to avoid jeopardising ongoing investigations. Professor Dirk Kotze, a political analyst, observed that the separation of fact from conjecture could be facilitated if Parliament were able to receive direct input from individuals such as Matlala.
The Ad Hoc Committee is under increasing pressure to ensure accountability, transparency, and impartiality in its handling of one of the most explosive enquiries in recent years, as evidenced by Diko’s question as proceedings intensify.
