Former President Jacob Zuma has been ordered by the court to repay R28.9 million in public funds that were unlawfully used to cover his personal legal defence. The ruling marks a major victory for accountability advocates after years of legal wrangling over who should bear the cost of Zuma’s extensive corruption trial expenses.
In a judgment delivered this week, the court found that the state had no legal obligation to finance Zuma’s private defence, ruling that the payment constituted an unlawful use of taxpayer money. The court further directed that, should Zuma fail to repay the amount, the State Attorney is authorised to attach his pension and other assets to recover the funds.
The order stems from a long-standing dispute dating back to Zuma’s tenure as president, when the state covered his mounting legal bills in multiple corruption and fraud cases linked to the controversial arms deal.
Legal analysts have hailed the ruling as a crucial precedent reinforcing the principle that public office bearers must personally bear the costs of their criminal defence. “This judgment restores a sense of justice public money cannot be used as a shield for private wrongdoing,” said one legal expert.
The Presidency and National Treasury are expected to oversee enforcement of the repayment order.
Meanwhile, Zuma’s legal team has not yet confirmed whether he intends to appeal the decision. If he fails to comply, the State Attorney could initiate proceedings to seize assets or deduct the debt from his presidential pension, ensuring full recovery on behalf of the taxpayer.
