SABC News reporter Samkele Maseko has shared a statement from ANC Secretary-General Fikile Mbalula that has ignited fresh debate within political circles. The remarks, posted on Saturday, address former President Jacob Zuma, with Mbalula alleging that Zuma brought Cyril Ramaphosa from the business world to serve as Deputy President, only to later plot against him. Mbalula recounted Ramaphosa’s inquiry about his future role, to which he was promised the presidency, a position he has now held for two terms.
The statement raises uncertainty about a potential third term, with Mbalula adding, “I don’t know if you want him for a third term.” He also mentioned commenting on Patrice Motsepe, a billionaire and Ramaphosa’s brother-in-law, but noted he was restrained by Motsepe’s associates and subsequently withdrew his remarks. The accompanying photograph shows Mbalula at a podium with microphones, his expression serious against a blue backdrop with the ANC logo, captured during a press briefing.
The statement, delivered with a mix of accusation and introspection, reflects ongoing tensions within the ANC, particularly around leadership succession and Ramaphosa’s tenure. Online reactions vary, with some interpreting Mbalula’s words as a jab at Zuma’s past influence, while others question the feasibility of a third term, citing constitutional limits. Comments also touch on Motsepe’s speculated political ambitions, with one person noting the “reining in” as evidence of internal power plays. The photograph, with its formal setting and Mbalula’s gesture, underscores the weight of the moment, prompting reflection on the party’s direction.
This incident arrives amidst a broader narrative of political realignment in South Africa, where past alliances and current strategies shape public discourse. The mention of Motsepe and the third-term speculation fuel speculation about the ANC’s future, urging a deeper look at leadership dynamics. For many, Mbalula’s statement symbolises a reckoning with history, while for others, it raises questions about transparency and intent. The contrast between the podium’s authority and the personal nature of the accusations invites scrutiny, highlighting the complexity of political narratives.
In a nation where every statement can reshape perception, this moment challenges us to consider the interplay of power and loyalty, urging clarity amidst speculation. As reactions grow, it underscores the ongoing evolution of South African politics.
