Former Zimbabwean Deputy Prime Minister Sparks Tension with Criticism of President Mnangagwa

In a fiery statement, renowned robotics professor and former deputy prime minister of Zimbabwe, Arthur Mutambara, has criticized President Emmerson Mnangagwa’s qualifications to judge the liberation struggle credentials of the late founding ZanuPF leader, Ndabaningi Sithole. Mutambara, known for his academic prowess and political activism, argues that Sithole was always a hero, regardless of the endorsement or lack thereof by Zanu-PF and its leaders.

Sithole, who faced persecution by his own party comrades and the late former president Robert Mugabe during and after the war, was accused of selling out during the liberation struggle. He was also alleged to have trained a counter-revolutionary force with funding from the United States’ Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). However, this narrative has been contested by those who accuse Zanu-PF of historical revisionism and spreading falsehoods.

Currently, Sithole is being honored for his role in the struggle. Mutambara, a respected figure in Zimbabwean politics, asserts that heroism is earned and not conferred. He emphasizes that Zanu-PF is not qualified to determine or undermine Sithole’s national hero status. Specifically targeting President Mnangagwa, Mutambara questions his limited involvement in the liberation struggle and declares him unworthy to speak on Sithole’s contributions.

Continuing his scathing critique of Zanu-PF and its leader, Mnangagwa, Mutambara, who recently launched the third book in his autobiography trilogy, draws attention to the persecution Sithole endured throughout his life in independent Zimbabwe. He points out that Sithole faced harassment at the hands of Zanu-PF and its government, with Mugabe and Mnangagwa playing significant roles. Sithole tragically died while undergoing a treason trial.

In light of recent events, Mutambara condemns what he calls a “fraudulent charade and vote-buying gimmick” at Freedom Farm. He urges others to join him in expressing contempt for such actions.

Mutambara’s strong words resonate with those who believe in the importance of acknowledging the contributions of individuals like Sithole, despite their past controversies. As the debate around Zimbabwe’s liberation struggle history continues, the differing narratives and interpretations highlight the complexities and deep divisions within the country’s political landscape.

The issue of liberation struggle credentials and hero status holds significant weight in Zimbabwe, with the recognition or denial of individuals’ contributions often serving as political leverage. As public discourse unfolds, it remains to be seen how President Mnangagwa and Zanu-PF will respond to Mutambara’s criticisms and whether it will spark further discussions on the country’s historical legacy.