Businessman Bonelela “Ngubengcuka” ka Mgudlwa has publicly responded to a Special Tribunal ruling ordering his company to repay R14.3 million, firmly rejecting the findings and distancing his wife, media personality Anele Mdoda, from the matter.
In a strongly worded statement, Mgudlwa emphasised that his wife had no involvement whatsoever in the events under investigation, which relate to COVID-19 procurement processes in 2020. He clarified that their relationship only began in mid-2024, culminating in their marriage in 2025, well after the period under scrutiny.
“Anele has no connection whatsoever to the events under scrutiny,” Mgudlwa said, dismissing any claims linking her to the case as “factually incorrect, malicious, reckless and unfair.” He further urged both the media and the public to act responsibly and refrain from implicating individuals who are not connected to the proceedings.
The businessman also defended his company’s conduct during the pandemic, stating that it participated in a Department of Health request for quotation (RFQ) process in line with regulations. According to Mgudlwa, the supplied products were delivered to an authorised depot licensed by the South African Health Products Regulatory Authority (SAHPRA) for testing and approval.
He maintained that all products met the required specifications and were accepted and utilised without issue. “There is no evidence of any financial loss to the State,” he asserted, challenging the basis of the tribunal’s conclusions.
Mgudlwa confirmed that he intends to take the matter to the High Court, signalling a legal battle ahead as he seeks to overturn the ruling. The case continues to draw public attention, particularly due to the high-profile figures associated with it, while raising broader questions about accountability and due process in pandemic-related procurement.
