Evidence presented at the Madlanga Commission has implicated Tshwane Metro Police Department (TMPD) deputy chief Umashi Dlamini in favouring specific companies for municipal contracts. According to testimony, Dlamini allegedly compiled a list of seven preferred businesses that he was purportedly instructed to prioritise by the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF).
The commission, which is probing allegations of corruption, maladministration, and irregular procurement processes, heard that the list was intended to influence municipal contract allocations in a manner favourable to the political party. Witnesses claim that these companies were given preferential treatment over others, raising concerns about transparency and fairness in municipal procurement.
“The evidence suggests there may have been direct interference in procurement processes,” one commission source said. “This is exactly the kind of conduct that the commission was established to investigate.”
Dlamini, who has not publicly responded to the allegations, is expected to face questioning as the commission continues its hearings. Legal experts note that if the claims are substantiated, they could indicate serious breaches of municipal procurement regulations, potentially involving corruption and abuse of office.
The EFF has also not officially commented on the matter, but the testimony has intensified scrutiny on the party’s alleged involvement in municipal affairs. Political analysts say the revelations could have broader implications, particularly as local governments increasingly face criticism over alleged political interference in administrative decisions.
The Madlanga Commission has heard similar claims regarding politically influenced tenders, highlighting a pattern of alleged manipulation of contracts in favour of preferred businesses. Authorities and civil society groups have emphasised the importance of holding public officials accountable to ensure integrity in procurement processes.
Observers say the outcome of the commission’s investigation may lead to disciplinary or criminal proceedings if wrongdoing is proven, with potential consequences for both municipal officials and associated political actors.
As proceedings continue, attention remains on the commission’s ability to uncover the full extent of the alleged irregularities, with stakeholders urging transparency and impartiality to restore public confidence in local government processes.