The Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) has clarified its stance regarding the recent revelations from the Madlanga Commission of Inquiry, with Secretary-General Marshall Dlamini confirming that he has not discussed the findings with party leader Julius Malema. Dlamini stated that he sees no necessity for internal discussions about the testimonies at this point.
Speaking to reporters, Dlamini emphasized, “I have not spoken to the Commander-in-Chief about these matters because there is no immediate need to. The party remains focused on its work and serving the people.” His comments come amid intense public and media scrutiny following high-profile testimonies that have raised questions about municipal operations, police oversight, and internal accountability mechanisms.
Dlamini’s statement also highlights the professional approach within the EFF leadership, suggesting that individual leaders are allowed to process and respond to developments independently without immediate consultation. He reassured members and the public that the party remains committed to its mission, and that internal dialogue would occur as necessary based on the significance of findings from the Commission.
“Our focus is on advancing the agenda of economic emancipation and social justice for South Africans. Internal matters are managed appropriately without overreaction to external events,” Dlamini said.
WATCH | Economic Freedom Fighters Secretary-General Marshall Dlamini says he has not spoken to EFF leader Julius Malema about some of the revelations from the Madlanga Commission of Inquiry, as he sees no need to. pic.twitter.com/f9nAWcZ3aa
— SABC News (@SABCNews) March 19, 2026
The Madlanga Commission, which has been investigating allegations of irregularities in municipal management, has produced a series of testimonies and revelations that continue to make headlines. While these disclosures have sparked debate and analysis, the EFF leadership appears determined to maintain organizational stability, ensuring that operational priorities are not overshadowed by external narratives.
Political analysts note that Dlamini’s stance is consistent with a strategy of measured response, allowing leaders to engage with sensitive findings deliberately rather than impulsively. By not immediately involving Malema, the Secretary-General demonstrates a calculated approach to internal party governance, preserving focus and cohesion within the movement.
As the Commission’s proceedings continue, the EFF’s approach may serve as a case study in how political organizations navigate high-profile inquiries, balancing transparency, leadership autonomy, and strategic messaging. For now, the message from Dlamini is clear: the party remains united, focused, and ready to respond to developments in a considered and organized manner.
