The Supreme Court of Appeal has given former president Jacob Zuma and his party, Umkhonto weSizwe (MK), permission to continue their fight against a High Court decision.
Earlier this year, the High Court in Johannesburg had dismissed their case against the South African Broadcasting Corporation. Zuma and his party had taken the SABC to court because they were unhappy with the broadcaster’s use of the term “government of national unity.” The court at the time said the broadcaster had done nothing wrong and that there was no legal reason to stop it from using the phrase.
Zuma and the MK Party disagreed strongly with that ruling. They believe the wording used by the SABC does not reflect the real nature of the government now in power. According to them, the way the broadcaster described the political arrangement gave the public a false picture of what is actually happening in the country.
After losing in the High Court, Zuma and his party decided to take the matter further. They filed papers asking the Supreme Court of Appeal to look into the case again. Their lawyers argued that the High Court had made serious mistakes in its decision and that another court could reach a different conclusion.
The Supreme Court of Appeal has now agreed that the matter should be heard. This means Zuma and the MK Party will get another chance to argue why they believe the broadcaster’s language is unfair and misleading. The case is expected to draw attention again as it deals with how public institutions communicate important political matters to citizens.
The outcome of this appeal will be important not just for Zuma and his party, but also for how the SABC reports on the current government. It may also influence how political terms are used in public debate going forward.