Cedric Nkabinde, chief of staff to suspended Police Minister Senzo Mchunu, has publicly accused General Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi of providing false testimony to Parliament during a session of the Ad Hoc Committee on Law Enforcement Oversight. The committee has been investigating alleged interference, corruption, and irregularities within South Africa’s policing structures, and Nkabinde’s statement adds further weight to the ongoing inquiry.
During the hearing, Nkabinde directly refuted claims made by Mkhwanazi, who had testified that Nkabinde personally brought him to Empangeni to be formally introduced to Minister Mchunu. Nkabinde was unequivocal in his denial, stating, “That did not happen. General Mkhwanazi lied to Parliament when he said I brought him to Empangeni to meet Minister Mchunu.” His comments challenge the credibility of Mkhwanazi’s testimony and raise questions about the accuracy of other statements made during the inquiry.
Nkabinde elaborated on his role within the ministry, stressing that he served in an administrative capacity and was not responsible for arranging meetings or facilitating introductions between high-ranking officials. He asserted that any suggestion to the contrary was false and designed to mislead the parliamentary committee.
The committee, which has been closely examining the conduct of senior officials linked to Mchunu, pressed Nkabinde on his interactions with both Mkhwanazi and the suspended minister. The questioning aimed to clarify whether Nkabinde had been involved in influencing police operations, appointments, or investigations. Nkabinde maintained that he acted strictly within the bounds of his administrative responsibilities and did not participate in any activities that would compromise the independence of law enforcement.
Observers have noted that Nkabinde’s testimony could have far-reaching implications, particularly if it calls into question the credibility of other witnesses or documents submitted to Parliament. The inquiry has highlighted broader concerns about transparency, accountability, and political influence within the security cluster. As the committee continues to hear testimonies from multiple officials and insiders, the outcome of the investigation may result in recommendations for disciplinary action, criminal investigation, or policy changes to prevent future interference in law enforcement.
Nkabinde’s statements underscore the high stakes of the inquiry, emphasizing the importance of truthful and accurate testimony in maintaining public trust in South Africa’s policing and governance systems.