Former South African Police Service (SAPS) National Commissioner, Riah Phiyega, has strongly denied claims that Vusimusi “Cat” Matlala, a key figure in a high-profile case, was at her home prior to his arrest.
The explosive allegation emerged during proceedings at the #MadlangaCommission, where Witness C reportedly claimed that Matlala had been harboured at Phiyega’s residence. The former police chief, however, has described the claim as “false, malicious, and deeply damaging.”
Phiyega, who has often found herself under the public spotlight since her tenure as the first female National Commissioner of SAPS, wasted no time in setting the record straight. Through her legal team, she has formally requested the Commission to allow her to challenge Witness C’s testimony, insisting that the truth must be brought to light.
“I categorically deny ever hosting, harbouring, or even meeting Mr. Matlala at my home before his arrest,” Phiyega stated. “This allegation is not only untrue, but it seeks to tarnish my reputation and integrity. I have nothing to hide and welcome any scrutiny.”
The Madlanga Commission, chaired by Justice Mbuyiseli Madlanga, continues to probe claims of misconduct, corruption, and political interference in policing and security structures. The allegation linking Phiyega to Matlala, a man previously linked to criminal investigations, has added fresh intrigue to the inquiry.
Legal experts say Phiyega’s insistence on cross-examining Witness C could become a pivotal moment in the Commission’s hearings. “If she’s granted the opportunity, her testimony could either dismantle the credibility of Witness C or open up new avenues of inquiry,” said constitutional law analyst Advocate Thembi Khuzwayo.
Public reaction has been divided. Some have applauded Phiyega for standing firm and demanding her right to be heard, while others believe the Commission must thoroughly investigate every claim — regardless of stature or past service.
Meanwhile, the Commission’s spokesperson confirmed that Phiyega’s formal request to appear before the panel has been received and will be considered in due course. “The Commission remains committed to fairness, balance, and due process,” the spokesperson added.
As the inquiry unfolds, all eyes will be on Justice Madlanga’s decision – one that could determine whether Riah Phiyega gets her chance to confront her accuser and reclaim her name.
