President Cyril Ramaphosa has affirmed that any group in South Africa is free to engage with foreign governments, including the United States, but emphasized that such groups do not represent the South African government or the country as a whole. His comments come amid reports that the Cape Independence Advocacy Group (CIAG) plans to send a delegation to Washington to seek support for its campaign to separate the Western Cape from South Africa. This follows similar efforts by Afrikaans lobbying organizations such as AfriForum, Solidariteit, and Orania, which recently visited the White House.
During a media briefing, Vincent Magwenya, spokesperson for President Ramaphosa, clarified the government’s position on these independent initiatives. He stressed that these groups are not elected by the South African people and do not reflect the views of the majority. “Our American counterparts will use their own discretion with respect to how they engage parties that are seeking to divide South Africa and return it to a period we have long passed—one that’s deeply etched into our DNA in terms of its painful history,” Magwenya stated.
Magwenya added that while the government cannot prevent individuals or groups from traveling abroad or engaging with foreign entities, it is crucial to recognize that these organizations operate independently and do not represent South Africa’s official stance.
The CIAG’s announcement has reignited debates about representation and secession, with critics warning that such efforts could harm South Africa’s international reputation and create confusion about its policies. Ramaphosa’s remarks aim to address these concerns by drawing a clear line between official diplomacy and private initiatives. His comments underscore the importance of distinguishing between groups pursuing their own agendas and those authorized to represent South Africa on the global stage.
Magwenya also touched on broader issues affecting South Africa’s relationship with the United States, noting that strained ties have created challenges in areas such as trade and diplomacy. However, Ramaphosa remains committed to addressing these issues through constructive dialogue. “We will continue correcting distortions where those distortions are being reported from an official level situated outside of the United States,” Magwenya said, specifically referencing misinformation about South Africa’s land reform process, which has been inaccurately portrayed as involving land grabs and expropriation without compensation.
Ramaphosa has described these tensions as a “hiccup” and emphasized the importance of engaging diplomatically while countering misleading narratives about South Africa’s policies. Unlike calls from some think tanks for sanctions against government officials, Ramaphosa has opted for a measured approach, focusing on rebuilding trust with the United States without unnecessary escalation.
Ultimately, Ramaphosa’s statements reflect his commitment to balancing democratic freedoms with the preservation of South Africa’s integrity in international relations. By allowing groups to express themselves while clarifying their lack of official status, he aims to maintain transparency and accountability. His spokesperson’s remarks further reinforce this stance, ensuring that South Africa’s position is not misrepresented in the context of independent lobbying efforts abroad.
