Prof. Mpho Matlala has spoken out about the testimony given by Lt. Gen. Shadrack Sibiya at the Madlanga Commission, claiming that Sibiya tried to corroborate the evidence of Minister Mchunu in an attempt to gain favour during the 2024 hearings.
According to Matlala, Sibiya’s approach was less about presenting an objective account and more about “scoring brownie points” with the minister. He highlighted a consistent pattern in Sibiya’s behaviour, noting that the general frequently engages in blame-shifting to avoid responsibility for controversial decisions and actions. This, Matlala argues, undermines both the credibility of his testimony and the investigative process itself.
The comments come as the commission continues to scrutinise multiple testimonies surrounding contentious police operations and administrative decisions. Matlala emphasised that Sibiya’s alignment with Mchunu’s version of events points to a worrying tendency among senior officials to let personal or political considerations influence the evidence they provide.
Observers say Matlala’s critique highlights a broader challenge faced by the commission: distinguishing between objective facts and statements influenced by self-interest or attempts to protect reputations. By trying to mirror the minister’s testimony, Sibiya may have complicated the commission’s ability to get a clear and accurate picture of what occurred, according to the academic.
Beyond the specifics of the testimony, Matlala’s remarks raise questions about accountability and transparency in senior police ranks. He warned that when high-ranking officials prioritise personal or political gain over the truth, public trust in law enforcement institutions suffers.
Matlala concluded that commissions like Madlanga’s play a crucial role in uncovering the facts, but their effectiveness depends on witnesses providing honest and unbiased evidence. Attempts to manipulate perceptions, shift blame, or curry favour, he says, must be exposed to safeguard institutional integrity and maintain public confidence in the justice system.
