The Madlanga Commission of Inquiry, established to investigate allegations of corruption and political interference within the South African Police Service (SAPS), has been rocked by explosive testimony involving some of the country’s most senior policing and political figures.
Businessman and self-proclaimed police informant, Oupa “Brown” Mogotsi, has alleged under oath that KwaZulu-Natal Police Commissioner, Lieutenant-General Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi, received a bribe from controversial businessman Vusimuzi “Cat” Matlala at his private residence in uMhlanga Ridge.
According to Mogotsi, the alleged encounter took place in July 2025 when Matlala reportedly travelled to KwaZulu-Natal to hand over an undisclosed amount of money to the provincial police chief.
The revelation comes shortly after Matlala was reportedly found in possession of a prohibited cellphone—an incident that occurred in the wake of a major media briefing by Mkhwanazi, during which he raised concerns about cartel infiltration, political interference, and widespread corruption in SAPS.
That briefing played a central role in the eventual establishment of the commission chaired by Constitutional Court Justice Mandisa Maya Madlanga.
Mogotsi claims his connection to Matlala stems from his work as a long-standing Crime Intelligence asset embedded within criminal networks since 1999, with roots tracing back to his involvement in uMkhonto weSizwe. However, his credibility is now under significant public scrutiny.
He has been accused of acting as a middleman between Matlala and suspended Police Minister Senzo Mchunu, allegedly soliciting R500,000 to fund travel and accommodation for ANC members attending a fundraising event in Cape Town. In exchange, Mogotsi is alleged to have supplied Matlala with classified police intelligence.
A recording submitted to the commission reportedly contains a voice believed to be Matlala’s, suggesting the payment was intended to bolster Mchunu’s political aspirations.
Mchunu, however, has downplayed his association with Mogotsi, describing him simply as a fellow “comrade.” The ANC has also attempted to distance itself by asserting that Mogotsi’s membership had lapsed—an assertion he firmly rejects.
Further complicating the picture are police raids on Mogotsi’s business premises and an alleged assassination attempt earlier this month in Vosloorus. While Mogotsi insists that armed assailants targeted his vehicle, investigators have noted inconsistencies in his account and an apparent absence of conclusive forensic evidence.
The allegations mark a dramatic turnaround, as it was Mkhwanazi himself who previously implicated both Matlala and Mogotsi in suspected tender manipulation and intelligence-related corruption.
The Commission is now confronted with a complex network of claims that cut across police leadership, prosecutorial structures, and political office-bearers.
As investigations by the Hawks and other oversight bodies continue, the unfolding saga strikes at the heart of South Africa’s criminal justice credibility.
The Madlanga Commission is emerging as a defining moment in the fight against entrenched corruption, with potential consequences that may reach the highest levels of law-enforcement and governance.
