In a heated parliamentary debate, Agriculture Minister John Steenhuisen launched a sharp critique against a member of the MK Party regarding their stance on Ukraine, emphasizing the importance of accurately understanding South Africa’s historical ties to the nation. Known for his wit and direct approach, Steenhuisen urged the MK Party member to “learn [their] history from the right places” rather than relying on second-hand narratives.
Steenhuisen highlighted the historical connection between uMkhonto WeSizwe (MK), the armed wing of the African National Congress (ANC) during apartheid, and Ukraine. He pointed out that liberation fighters, under the leadership of Joe Modise—a significant figure in the MK—received military training in Odessa, Ukraine. This, he argued, is a critical aspect of South Africa’s struggle history that newer political groups should acknowledge and respect.
“Don’t believe everything Ubaba ka Duduzane tells you,” Steenhuisen quipped, making a veiled reference to certain public figures whom he believes misinform or distort historical events. He continued, “The real uMkhonto WeSizwe was involved in strategic training overseas, including in Ukraine. This history is crucial in understanding the contributions of our freedom fighters.”
“I then want to respond to the member from the MK Party about Ukraine. Clearly, you’re learning your history from the wrong places; don’t believe everything Ubaba ka Duduzane tells you. The real uMkhonto WeSizwe, you would know that Joe Modise took them for training in Odessa,… pic.twitter.com/O7GLcBxnZX
— News Live SA (@newslivesa) October 29, 2024
His remarks underscore a growing tension between the older generation of political leaders, who experienced the anti-apartheid struggle firsthand, and emerging groups like the MK Party, which seeks to revive the legacy of uMkhonto WeSizwe. Steenhuisen questioned the MK Party’s authenticity, suggesting that it diverged from the principles and sacrifices of the original MK fighters.
“Go and understand your history before you come here and pretend to be uMkhonto weSizwe,” Steenhuisen asserted, calling for a respectful approach to the legacy of South Africa’s liberation icons. His comments reflect ongoing debates about historical interpretation and the responsibilities of political parties in honoring the past.
